Reading Length | United States. District Court (New York : Southern District)

William Vanhook, vs. John Pendleton & Jonathan Leachbefore the Honorable Samuel Nelson, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and the Honorable Samuel R. Betts, District Judge

s.n.1846-01-01

In the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York, in equity, William B. Sickels and others, vs. David L. Youngs and Stephen Cutterpleadings order for feigned issue and proceedings and evidence on trial of feigned issue before Judge Betts and a jury, at New York, from Dec. 20th, 1854, to Jan. 13th, 1855

Wm. C. Bryant & Co., Printers1855-01-01

The argument of Mr. Edward N. Dickersonwith his notes and explanations, the charge of Judge Nelson, and the verdict of the jury in the case of Sickels vs. Borden, defended by "The Novelty Iron Works" and Mr. Horatio Allen : tried in the Circuit Court of the United States, in the city of New-York : November term, 1856

J.S. Voorhies1856-01-01

Reports of cases in admiraltyargued and determined in the District court of the United States for the southern district of New York

Little, Brown and Co.1857-01-01

Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the District Court of the United ...

Jacob R. Halsted1857-01-01

[Papers of the New York Prize Court during the Civil War]

1861-01-01

Trial of the officers and crew of the Schooner Savannah, on the charge of piracyUnited States Circuit Court, Southern District of New York, Wednesday, Oct., 23 1861 : the United States against Thomas Harrison Baker, Charles Sydney Passalaigue, John Harleston, Joseph Cruse Del Carno, Patrick Daly, John Murphy, Martin Galvin, Henry Cashman Howard, Henry Oman, William Charles Clarke, Richard Palmer, Alexander Carter Coid, Albert G. Ferris

[s.n.]1861-01-01

The United States, against the schooner "Stephen Hart" and her cargoIn prize. Reply. Argument of the counsel for captors

F. McElroy1863-01-01

The United States vs. the brig Delta and her cargoin prize : opinion and decision of the court

s.n.1863-01-01

The United States vs. the schooner Stephen Hart and her cargoin prize : opinion of the Court

J.W. Amerman1863-01-01

Before Judge Betts, July 10th, 1863, the United States, at al., libellants and captors, vs. the Steamship Peterhoff, her tackle, &c., and cargo, in Prize

C.S. Westcott & Co., Printers1863-01-01

The United States vs. the Bark Springbok and her cargoin prize : opinion of the court

J.W. Amerman, printer1863-01-01

The United States vs. The Steamer Peterhoff and Her Cargo.In prize. Opinion of the court

J. W. Amerman, printer1864-01-01

Daniel Treadwell vs. Robert P. Parrott

Alfred Mudge & Son, Printers1865-01-01

Reports of Cases in Prize, Argued and Determined in the Circuit and District Courts of the ...

Gov. print. off.1866-01-01

The United States vs. The steamship Meteor, her tackle, &cOpinion of the court

J.F. Trow & co., printers1866-01-01

In matter of petition of Galwey & Casado, and order of Judge Betts thereonpower of the government to enter private premises, search, seize and carry away private papers made by the occupant, his associates or agents, and keep the same at the will of the solicitor of the treasury as evidence of an attempted or meditated fraud on the revenue : argument in behalf of petitioners

Press of Baptist & Taylor, Law-Case Printers1867-01-01

Report of the case of the Steamship Meteorlibelled for alleged violation of the Neutrality Act ...

Little, Brown, and Company1869-01-01

Jugements des cours de prises des États-Unis d'Amérique dans l'affaire de la barque anglaise "Springbok" et de son chargement

Amyot1870-01-01

John Sedgwick, as assignee, &c., of the Manhattan Engraving Co., petitioner, vs. Charles A. Jackson, respondentpetition of review

Evening Post Steam Presses1873-01-01

To the Circuit Court of the United States, in and for the Southern District of New York, in the Second Judicial Circuit, charges preferred against John I. Davenport, as U.S. commissioner and chief supervisor of elections by Oswald Ottendorfer, Amos F. Eno, George A. Heinrichs, Andrew J. Haggerty, John B. Lewis, John Doran, and Patrick H. Maguire

Francis Hart & Co., Printers1874-01-01

David L. Yulee vs. Francis Voseaffidavits of Francis Vose and James B.C. Drew

[s.n.]1876-01-01

Francis Vose against David L. Yulee

P.F. McBreen, law and job printer1876-01-01

David Banks, Charles Banks and Anthony Bleecker Banks, complainants, against John R. McDivitt, Howard Campbell and Franklin G. Campbell, defendantspleadings, evidence, exhibits, &c

Amerman & Co., Law Printers1876-01-01

The United States ex rel. Peter Coleman against Lewis F. Payn, United States Marshal, the same against John I. Davenport, United States Commissionerrelator's brief in rebuttal

Evening Post Steam Presses1878-01-01

Oliver Farnum and Henry Dotterer vs. Francis Voseanswer

Benj. H. Tyrrel, law printer1880-01-01

The Banque Franco-Egyptienne, et al., vs. John Crosby Brown, et al

[s.n.]1880-01-01

Alonzo T. Cross vs. Duncan MacKinnon, Alexander M. Sutherland, and Francis C. Brown, composing the firm of D. Mackinnon & Codefendants' record

John Pohemus, printer and mf'g stationer1881-01-01

Alonzo T. Cross vs. Duncan Mackinnon et alsdefendants' brief

John Polhemus, printer and mf'g stationer1881-01-01

In the circuit court of the United States, in and for the southern district of New YorkSecond circuit. In equity. C.C. Campbell, vs. the mayor, aldermen, and commonalty of the city of New York. Pleadings and proofs

Franklin Press, Rand, Avery & co.1881-01-01

The American Bell Telephone Company[and the Metropolitan Telephone and Telegraph Company] vs. the People's Telephone Company, et al. ...

American Bell Telephone Company, Executive Office1882-01-01

American Bell Telephone Co., et al., v. the People's Telephone Co., et alevidence for complainants

Alfred Mudge & Son, Law Printers1882-01-01

Abstract of evidence taken in the suit of American Bell telephone company et al. vs. the People's telephone company et alsIn equity. <Bell vs. Drawbaugh,> now pending in the Circuit court of the United States, Southern district of New York

Priv. print.1884-01-01

American Bell Telephone Company et al., v. the People's Telephone Company et al., before Hon. William J. Wallace, circuit judgeargument of J.J. Storrow, Esq

[s.n.]1884-01-01

J. & P. Coats vs. Merrick Thread Co., et al., in equity

[s.n.]1884-01-01

The American Bell Telephone Company, et al., vs the People's Telephone Company, et alevidence for complainants

Lanes Hart, printer and binder1884-01-01

Pacific Railroad, of Missouri, complainant, against Robert L. Cutting, Jr., Peter Mari,̌ George R. Fearing, Edmund W. Bodine, Jane H. Cowdrey, as executrix of the last will and testament of Nathaniel A. Cowdrey (deceased) and Richard C. Kerens, defendants, in equity no. 3396

[s.n.]1886-01-01

[Banque Franco-Egyptienne et al., against John Crosby Brown, et alletters and telegrams]

[s.n.]1886-01-01

The bank tax decisionfull opinion of Judge Wallace.

A. Tappan1886-01-01

[Henry Louis Bischoffsheim, Banque Franco-Egyptienne, et al., complainants, against John Crosby Brown, et al, defendantsPlaintiffs' proofs

Evening Post job print. off.1886-01-01

The Mercantile National Bank of the City of New York vs. the mayor, aldermen and commonalty of the city of New York, and George W. McLean, receiver of taxesrecord and complainants' affidavits

John Polhemus, printer and mf'g stationer1886-01-01

Original bill, the Banque Franco-Egyptienne and others against William Butler Duncan, impleaded with others, cross bill, William Butler Duncan against the Banque Franco-Egyptienne and othersbrief for defendants to cross bill on final hearing

Evening Post Job Printing Office1887-01-01

Henry Louis Bischoffsheim against John Crosby Brown, et al

[s.n.]1887-01-01

The judgments of the prize courts of the United States of America, in the case of the British barque "Springbok" and her cargo

Waterlow, Printers1887-01-01

The New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad Company, libellant and appellant, against the Steam Tug "Charles H. Senff," Henry O. Havemeyer, claimant and appellantapostles

Benj. H. Tyrrel, law printer1888-01-01

The American Bell Company and others vs. the People's Telephone Company and othersdefendant's testimony in sur-rejoinder

[s.n.]1888-01-01

Henry L. Bischoffsheim vs. Brown and Seligman, trustees, impleaded with othersbrief for defendants Brown and Seligman, trustees

[s.n.]1888-01-01

Sir Peter Coats, et al., vs. the Merrick Thread Company, et al., in equity

Burgoyne Quick Printing Co.1888-01-01

J. & P. Coats vs. Merrick Thread Co., et albrief for defendants

John Polhemus, printer and mf'g stationer1888-01-01

Sir Peter Coats, et al., against the Merrick Thread Company, et aloral argument of Frederic H. Betts, on behalf of complainants, before the Hon. Hoyt H. Wheeler

Benj. H. Tyrrel, printer1888-01-01

Sir Peter Coats, et al., vs. the Merrick Thread Company, et albrief for complainants on final hearing

Benj. H. Tyrrel, printer1888-01-01

Stephen H. Mills et al., against the Steamship "Scotia", Tweedy, Peters & Company against the samebrief

Burgoyne Quick Printing Co.1890-01-01

Gerhard Wessels and Charles T. Wessels, complainants, vs. John E. Kerr and Alexander Rerrie, defendants, in equitybrief for final hearing on behalf of defendants

Evening Post Job Printing House1890-01-01

Gerhard Wessels and Charles T. Wessels, complainants, against John E. Kerr and Alexander Rerrie, defendantsprinted papers on demurrer

Evening Post Job Printing Office1890-01-01

Henry Louis Bischoffsheim against John Crosby Brown and Jesse Seligman, trustees, James Seligman, the executors of Joseph Seligman and others, in equitybrief for James Seligman and the executors of Joseph Seligman

Livingston Middleditch, printer1890-01-01

H.L. Bischoffsheim vs. John Crosby Brown et alchronological reprint of letters and cables appearing in the exhibits

Burgoyne Quick Printing Co.1890-01-01

John E. Kerr and Alexander Rerrie, complainants, against Gerhard Wessels, Charles T. Wessels and Henry E. Wessels, defendantsprinted papers on exceptions to defendants' answer

Evening Post Job Printing Office1890-01-01

John E. Kerr and Alexander Rerrie, complainants, against Gerhard Wessels, Charles T. Wessels and Henry E. Wessels, defendants, in equitybrief on exceptions to answer

Evening Post Job Printing Office1890-01-01

Gerhard Wessels and Charles T. Wessels, complainants, v. John E. Kerr and Alexander Rerrie, defendantsdefendants' answer and proofs

The Evening Post Job Printing House1891-01-01

The New York and Northern Railway Company vs. the New York and New England Railroad Companydecided May 31, 1892

s.n.1892-01-01

New York Security and Trust Company, James O. Bloss and George K. Gilluly, complainants, against Equitable Mortgage Company, defendant, in equity

[s.n.]1893-01-01

Edison Electric Light Company and the Edison Electric Illuminating Company of New York vs. Robert Goelet, et albill of complaint and affidavits on motion for preliminary injunction

C.G. Burgoyne1893-01-01

The Berwind-White Coal Mining Company against the Steamships "Kate", "Joshua Nicholson", "Florida" and "Chilian"brief of argument for the libellant

Benj. H. Tyrrel, Printer1893-01-01

In memoriam, Joseph F. Mosherdied April 8, 1894 : minutes of the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York

[s.n.]1894-01-01

American Graphophone Company vs. Cleveland Walcutt, Walter H. Miller and Henry J. Hagen, defendantin equity

[s.n.]1894-01-01

Rules in bankruptcy of the District court of the United States for the Southern District of the New York

1899-01-01

Appendix to Chanler [sic] against Sherman in the United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York(brief and argument, together with certified copies and discussion thereon of the 1897 and 1899 proceedings in New York and the 1901 proceedings in Virgnia which preceded same) : John Armstrong Chanler [sic], of counsel for plaintiff

O.E. Flanhart Printing Co.1905-01-01

Consolidated Gas Company of New York, complainant, vs. Julius M. Mayer, as attorney general of the state of New York, William Travers Jerome, as district attorney of New York County, Frederick E. Gunnison, John C. Davies and Lucian L. Shedden, constituting the New York State Commission of Gas and Electricity, and then city of New York, defendants, before Arthur H. Masten, special master

[s.n.]1906-01-01

Consolidated Gas Company of New York, complainant, vs. Julius M. Mayer, as attorney general of the state of New York, William Travers Jerome, as district attorney of New York County, Frederick E. Gunnison, John C. Davies and Lucian L. Shedden, constituting the New York State Commision of Gas and Electricity and the city of New York, defendants

[s.n.]1906-01-01

Louis E. Beckmann, plaintiff, against Frederick Joseph, Moses Joseph, Leo Joseph, National Packing Co., Swift & Co., and Armour & Co., defendantsdemurrer book

B.H. Tyrrel, printer1909-01-01

Rumford Chemical Works, complainant vs. Hygienic Chemical Company (of New York), James E. Heller and Adolph Hirsh, defendantsdefendant's record

Evening Post Job Printing Office1910-01-01

In the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York, the Vacuum Cleaner Company vs. American Rotary Valve Company

[s.n.]1911-01-01

United States of America vs. the American Tobacco Company and othersopinions of the court, and decree

The Evening Post Job Printing Office1911-01-01

Law of the Associated Press

[s.n.]1914-01-01

The United States of America, petitioner, v. the New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company and others, defendantsOriginal petition

Gov. Prtg. Off.1914-01-01

United States of America, petitioner, against Prince Line, Limited and others, defendantstestimony of witnesses for the petitioner

L. Middleditch Co.1915-01-01

Transcript of record. Supreme court of the United States, October term, 1915. No. 518The United States, appellant vs. Prince Line, limited, Paul F. Gerhard, Charles Z. Gerhard, Francis J. Zimmerman et al. Appeal from the District court of the United States for the Southern district of New York ...

1915-01-01

United States of America, petitioner, against American-Asiatic Steamship Co., and others, defendantsbrief in behalf of Dodwell & Company, Ltd., Bucknall Steamship Lines, Ltd., Norton & Son, Prince Line, Ltd., New York & Oriental Steamship Company, Ltd., Barber & Company, Lancashire Shipping Company, Ltd., and Rankin, Gilmour & Company, Ltd., defendants

[s.n.]1915-01-01

No. 518, the United States, appellant, vs. Prince Line, Limited, Paul F. Gerhard, Charles Z. Gerhard, Francis J. Zimmerman, et alappeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York : record : testimony of witnesses for the petitioner

[s.n.]1915-01-01

Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, in effect February 1, 1913 (revised to October 2, 1916)

National Surety Company1916-01-01

The United States of America, complainant, against Charles D. Millar, Edward P. Barrett, David S. Murden, Frederick P. Close, Ebenezer Bull, William C. Hull, George W. Burton, John J. Sinnott, Daniel C. Hickey, Frederick L. Stahl, Andrew Bridgeman, Charles H. Heinsohn, Alfred L. Wendover, Howard R. Washburn, Edward Carson, George A. Casey, George T. Bacon, Louis Goss, Charles McDonald, Albert J. Lobdell, John F. Jenkins, Hugh Herndon, George I. Ruscoe, George J. Werner, Fred Lavis, George Turner, Robert P. Smith, George K. Cox, Frank J. Lamb, Arthur E. Muth, Alfred E. Merz, Edward A. Forsyth, Frank Madden, William J. McGeory, Michael J. Nolan, William Dunn, Clarence Alexander, Benjamin Fitzgibbon, Frederick McGrath, and James M. Strang, constituting the Board of Supervisors of the county of Westchester, and said county of Westchester, defendants

[s.n.]1917-01-01

Henry R. Towne, plaintiff, vs. Mark Eisner, collector, etc., defendantmemorandum in support of demurrer

[s.n.]1917-01-01

The "Lusitania."

American Association for International Conciliation1918-01-01

In the matter of the petition of the Cunard Steamship Company, Limited, as owners of the steamship "Lusitania", for limitation of its liabilitybefore Hon. Julius M. Mayer, district judge.

s.n.1918-01-01

Cover image for In the matter of the petition of the Cunard Steamship Company, limited, as owners of the steamship "Lusitania", for limitation of its liability

In the matter of the petition of the Cunard Steamship Company, limited, as owners of the steamship "Lusitania", for limitation of its liability

s. n.1918-01-01

Summary of the factsa brief summary with footnote references to the record, of the history and condition of the Corn Products Refining Company down to March, 1913

Geo. H. Ellis Co.1919-01-01

Gustavus Myers, against the Mail & express company and Richard Spillane ...

1919-01-01

Edwin Adams, Julius C. Morse, George C. Fisk, James F. Ray and Mary M. Clark, complainants, against, William Rockefeller, Charles M. Pratt, Lewis Cass Ledyard, and J. Pierpont Morgan, Herbert L. Satterlee, William P. Hamilton and Lewis Cass Ledyard, as executors under the last will and testament of J. Pierpont Morgan, deceased, and Florence A.V. Twombly, as executrix under the last will and testament of Hamilton McK. Twombly, deceased, and New York, New Heaven & Hartford Railroad Company, defendants, in equity, no. 13-363brief on behalf of the defendant, the New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company, in opposition to the application for the appointment of a Limited receiver

Stillman Appellate Printing Co.1920-01-01

In the matter of the petition of the Cunard Steamship Company, Limited, as owners of the Steamship "Lusitania," for limitation of its liability, before Hon. Julius M. Mayer, district judge, the "Lusitania"opinion of court

[s.n.]1920-01-01

In the District Court of the United States, Southern District of New York, in equity no. 11/301, the United States of America, petitioner, v. the New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company and others, defendantsdecree

[s.n.]1920-01-01

Rules of the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New YorkIn force June 6, 1921

Baker, Voorhis & Co.1921-01-01

In the District Court of the United States Southern District of New York, United States of America, petitioner, vs. Gypsum Industries Association, et al., defendantspetition

Press of Fremont Payne, Inc.1923-01-01

Rules of the District Court of the United States for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, including admiralty rules in effect July 1, 1924 and general, law, equity and bankruptcy rules in effect January 1, 1925

National Surety Company1925-01-01

Anne Nichols, complainant, against Universal Pictures Corporation, Carl Laemmle and Harry Pollard, defendantscomplainant's trial brief on the law and facts

The Alpert Press1929-01-01

Memorandum filed with the report prepared by counsel for the Association of the bar of the city of New York, New York county lawyers' association, and Bronx county bar association, petitioners herein, concerning the general investigation of the administration of bankrupt estates, which was instituted upon petition of the United States attorney and upon the intervening petition of the three bar associations, and which has been conducted under orders of this court, dated March 6th, 1929, and March 25th, 1929, respectively

1930-01-01

Bankers trust company, as trustee, etc., plaintiff, against James B. Wilbur, Jr., the Art Institute of Chicago, Field museum of natural history, Marietta Tate, Gwladys W. Kramer, Ella Pardee Hayes, Mabel Long Beardslee, the University of Vermont, et al, defendants ...

1930-01-01

In the matter of an inquiry into the administration of bankrupts' estates conducted before Hon. Thomas D. Thatcher, judge of the United States District court for the southern District of New York ...

Court press1930-01-01

Georges Lewys, complainant, v. Eugene O'Neill, Boni & Liveright, Inc., Horace Liveright, Inc., and Theatre Guild, Inc. defendants ...

The Court1931-01-01

Administration of bankruptcy estatesreport submitted by counsel to the petitioners in the matter of an inquiry into the administration of bankrupt estates conducted before Hon. Thomas D. Thacher, Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, under orders of said Court, dated March 6, 1929, and March 25, 1929, pursuant to the petition of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York, the New York County Lawyer's Association, and the Bronx County Bar Association, and the order of said Court made thereon, together with a memorandum filed with the report prepared by the aforesaid Court

U.S. Govt. Print. Off.1931-01-01

United States of America, petitioner, v. the Sugar Institute, Inc., et al., defendantsEconomic brief. Nature of competition; competition and secret price discriminations

1933-01-01

United States of America, petitioner, v. the Sugar Institute, Inc., et al., defendantseconomic brief : nature of competition : competition and secret price discriminations

[s.n.]1934-01-01

In the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New YorkUnited States of America, petitioner, vs. American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, Music Publishers Protective Association, Music Dealers Service, Inc., et al., defendants : answer

[s.n.]1934-01-01

United States of America, libelant vs. one book called UlyssesRandom House, Inc., claimant

Lakeside Press1935-01-01

United States of America, libelant vs. one book called "Ulysses", Random House, Inc., claimant

Dutton1935-01-01

Houghton Mifflin Company, plaintiff-appellant, against Stackpole Sons, Inc., and The Telegraph Press, defendants-respondents ...

Pandick Press1939-01-01

The American Brake Shoe and Foundry Company, plaintiff, against Interborough Rapid Transit Company, defendant, application 98report of special master

[s.n.]1940-01-01

United States of America ... v. Aluminum Company of America et al. ...[Briefs, records, judgments

1941-01-01

Alden-Rochelle, Inc., et al., plaintiffs, against American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, et al., defendantsUnited States District Court, Southern District of New York, civil 18-6.

s.n.1948-01-01

Bankruptcy rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of the New York

1948-01-01

United States of America, plaintiff, v. The American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, defendantcivil action no. 42-245 : final judgment.

s.n.1949-01-01

Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1951. No. 111. Julius Rosenberg and Ethel Rosenberg, petitioners, vs. the United States of America. No. 112. Morton Sobell, petitioner, vs. the United States of Americapetitions for writs of certiorari and exhibit thereto

National Committee to Secure Justice in Rosenberg Case1952-01-01

13 Communists speak to the courtElizabeth Gurley Flynn [and others]

New Century Publishers1953-01-01

Cover image for Opinion of Harold R. Medina, United States circuit judge

Opinion of Harold R. Medina, United States circuit judgein United States of America, plaintiff, v. Henry S. Morgan, Harold Stanley, et al., doing business as Morgan Stanley & Co., et al., defendants

Record Press1953-01-01

United States v. H. S. Morgan, et al.

1953-01-01

Opinion of Harold R. MedinaUnited States circuit judge in United States of America, plaintiff v. Henry S. Morgan, Harold Stanley, et al., doing business as Morgan Stanley & Co., et al., defendants. Filed, October 14, 1953. [Civil action no. 43-757

1953-01-01

The record of the trial in which Alger Hiss was convicted on two counts of perjury ...

1954-01-01

Corrected opinion of Harold R. Medina, United States circuit judge in United States of America, plaintiff, v. Henry S. Morgan, Harold Stanley, et al., doing business as Morgan Stanley & Co., et al., defendants.Filed, February 4, 1954.

1954-01-01

Corrected opinion of Harold R. Medina, United States circuit judge in United States of America, plaintiff v. Henry S. Morgan, Harold Stanley, et al., doing business as Morgan Stanley & Co., et al., defendants.Filed, February 4, 1954. [Civil action no. 43.-757.]

1954-01-01

Opinion of Harold R. Medina, United States Circuit judge in United States of America, plaintiff, v. Henry S. Morgan, Harold Stanley & co., et al., defendantsFiled October 14, 1953

Record press1954-01-01

Grove Press, Inc. and Reader's Subscription, Inc., plaintiffs against Robert K. Christenberry, individually and as postmaster of the city of New York, defendantopinion

Readers' Subscription1959-01-01

Grove Press, Inc. and Readers' Subscription, Inc., plaintiffs, against Robert K. Christenberry, individually and as Postmaster of the City of New York, defendantcivil 147-87, opinion

1959-01-01

United States of America, plaintiff, against the Watchmakers of Switzerland Information Center, inc. [and others] defendantsopinion

Record Press1962-01-01

Celebration of 175th anniversary of the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, New York, New York, November 5, 1964-2:00 p.m.

1964-01-01

The United States vs the schooner Stephen Hart & her cargo

Thomson Gale1969-12-31

Minutes and rolls of attorneys of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, 1789-1841

National Archives, National Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration1972-01-01

Judgment records of the U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York, 1794-1840

National Archives and Records Service1972-01-01

Judgment records of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, 1795-1840

National Archives and Records Service1973-01-01

Corrected opinion of Harold R. Medina, United States circuit judge, in United States of America, plaintiff, v. Henry S. Morgan, Harold Stanley, et al., defendants.

Arno Press1975-01-01

Records of the clerk of the court, 1746-1932, and of the U.S. Commissioners, 1837-1860, of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

National Archives, National Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration1975-01-01

The judgements of the prize courts of the United States of America, in the case of the British barque "Springbok" and her cargo

Waterlow, Printers1984-01-01

Vietnama documentary history--Westmoreland v. CBS

Clearwater Pub. Co.1985-01-01

Trial of the officers and crew of the schooner Savannah

Notable Trials Library1997-01-01

The United States against the ship Cheshire and cargoin prize : opinion of the court

s.n.

United States. District Court (New York : Southern District)

Also known as

Identifiers

Top Subjects

Books by United States. District Court (New York : Southern District)