United States. Interstate Commerce Commission

Books by United States. Interstate Commerce Commission

Total count: 270

• Classification of operating expenses ... in accordance with section 20 of the Act to regulate commerce. Revised issue

  Govt. print. off.1882-01-01
• Before the Inter-State Commerce Commission, Francis B. Thurber, et al., Committee of the New York Board of Trade and Transportation vs. New York Central & Hudson River R.R.Co., Pennsylvania R.R.Co., New York, Lake Erie & Western R.R.Co., Baltimore & Ohio R.R.Co., and Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R.R.Co., no. 65, Thomas L. Greene, manager of the Merchants' Freight Burreau, etc., et al., vs. the same, no. 66, Francis H. Leggett, et al., vs. the same, no. 67

  Willis McDonald & Co., Printers1888-01-01
• Book of instructions for the guidance of carriers in making annual reports to the Interstate commerce commission, as required by section 20 of the Act to regulate commerce

  Govt. print. off.1888-01-01
• 
  Interstate commerce commission reportsreports and decisions of the Interstate Commerce Commission of the United States

  L.K. Strouse1888-01-01
• Classification of operating expenses as prescribed by the Interstate commerce commission in accordance with section 20 of the Act to regulate commerce

  Govt. Print. Off.1888-01-01
• Revised and amended rules of practice in cases and proceedings before the commission, adopted June 8, 1889

  Govt. Prtg. Office1889-01-01
• Classification of operating expenses as prescribed by the Interstate commerce commission in accordance with section 20 of the Act to regulate commerce. Rev. issue

  Govt. print. off.1889-01-01
• 
  Inter-state Commerce Commission, Blanton Duncan, complainant versus the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe R.R. et alcomplainants brief

  Blanton Duncan]1891-01-01
• In the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of PennsylvaniaIn equity. The Interstate Commerce Commission vs. The Lehigh Valley Railroad Company. Argument of Simon Sterne, on behalf of the Interstate Commerce Commission, to enforce its order

  D.Taylor, Law Printer1892-01-01
• Notice to common carriers of the standard height of draw bars

  Interstate Commerce Commission1893-01-01
• In the United States Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, New Orleans, LA., January 29, 1894�11 a.m., Judges Pardee, McCormick, and Toulmin sitting, the Interstate Commerce Commission vs. the Cincinnati, New Orleans and Texas Pacific Rwy. Co. et al

  [s.n.]1894-01-01
• Classification of operating expenses as prescribed by the Interstate commerce commission in accordance with section 20 of the Act to regulate commerceRevised issue, taking effect July 1, 1894

  Govt. print. off.1894-01-01
• Before the Interstate Commerce Commissionunreasonable and unjust rates, undue and unreasonable prejudice and disadvantage, greater charges for shorter distance. The Johnston Larimer Dry Goods Company,Complainant v. the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad Company [et al.]. Decided May 12, 1896. Report and opinion of the Commission

  [s.n.]1896-01-01
• Investigation of grain rates at Missouri River points

  1897-01-01
• Railway rates and charges,etcLetter of the chairman of the Interstate Commerce Commission, transmitting,in response to a resolution of the Senate of May 2,1898,so much of the testimony given before the commission on December 6, 1897

  1898-01-01
• Address

  Govt. print. off.1899-01-01
• Supplement to the first issue of the Classification of operating revenues as prescribed by the Interstate Commerce Commission for steam roads in accordance with section 20 of the Act to Regulate CommerceEffective on July 1, 1908

  Govt. Print. Off.1900-01-01
• Safety appliancesfrom the fourteenth annual report of the Interstate Commerce Commission, December 24, 1900

  Interstate Commerce Commission1900-01-01
• The Interstate Commerce Commission v. the Nashville, Chattanooga and St. Louis Railway Company, the Western and Atlantic Railroad Company, the Central of Georgia Railway Company, and the Georgia Southern and Florida Railway Companyheard before the Hon. James W. Locke, at Jacksonville, Fla., December 4, 1901 : argument for the complainant

  s.n.1901-01-01
• The Interstate Commerce Commission, appellant, v. the Nashville, Chattanooga and St. Louis Railway Company, the Western and Atlantic Railroad Company, the Central of Georgia Railway Company, and the Georgia Southern and Florida Railway Company, appelleesappeal from the United States Circuit Court, Southern District of Florida : argument for the complainant

  s.n.1901-01-01
and 250 more