Manhattan Railway Company
Identifiers
- Open LibraryOL7216651A
Top Subjects
- Trials, litigation (33)
- Manhattan Railway Company (33)
- New York (State) (33)
- New York (31)
- Trials (Trespass) (24)
- New York Elevated Railroad Company (21)
- Damages (18)
Books by Manhattan Railway Company
Total count: 36
-
Legal opinions and sworn evidence showing why the Manhattan Company's charter should be annulledpublisher not identified1881-01-01
-
The New York National Exchange Bank, plaintiff and respondent, against the Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company and the Manhattan Railway Company, defendants and appellantscase on appeal[s.n.]1886-01-01
-
Bertha R. Kenkele and John P. Kenkele as surviving trustees, &c., plaintiff's, respondents, against the Manhattan Railway Company and the Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company, defendants, appellantsbrief for defendants, appellantsC.G. Burgoyne's Printing Business1889-01-01
-
Bertha R. Kenkele and John P. Kinkel as surviving trustees under the last will and testament of Philip A. Kenkele, deceased, plaintiff's and respondents, against the Manhattan Railway Company and the Metopolitan Elevated Railway Company, defendants and appellantscase on appealOberly & Newell, Printers1889-01-01
-
Sophie E. Minton, plaintiff, respondent, against the New York Elevated Railroad Company and the Manhattan Railway Company, defendants, appellants, December General term, 1889brief for appellantsC.G. Burgoyne's Printing Business1890-01-01
-
S. Charles Welsh, as surviving executor and trustee under the last will and testament of George W. Welsh, deceased, plaintiff-respondent, against the New York Elevated Railroad Company and the Manhattan Railway Company, defendants-appellantsbrief for defendants-appellants[s.n.]1890-01-01
-
In the Court of Appeals, James P. Kernochan, individually and as executor and trustee and others plaintiffs and respondents, against the New York Elevated Railroad Company and the Manhattan Railway Company, defendants and appellants, no. 464brief for respondentsEvening Post Job Printing House1890-01-01
-
Edith K. Roosevelt and Emily T. Carow, plaintiffs and respondents, against the New York Elevated Railroad Company and the Manhattan Railway Company, defendants and appellantsbrief for respondentsEvening Post Job Printing Office1890-01-01
-
Bertha R. Kenkele and John P. Kinkel, as surviving trustees under the last will and testament of Philip A. Kenkele, deceased, plaintiffs and respondents, against the Manhattan Railway Company and the Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company, defendants and appellantsrespondents' pointsEvening Post Job Printing Office1890-01-01
-
In the Court of Appeals, Jacob B. Tallman plaintiff and respondent, against the Metropolitan Elevated Railroad Company and the Manhattan Railway Company, defendants and appellantsbrief in behalf of owners who have procured judgements in actions where real estate experts testifiedC.G. Burgoyne's Printing Business1890-01-01
-
Sophie E. Minton, plaintiff and respondent, against the New York Elevated Railroad Company and the Manhattan Railway Company, defendants and appellantsbrief for respondentEvening Post Job Printing Office1890-01-01
Rules and regulations for the government of the operating officers and employe s of the Manhattan Railway Coto take effect January 1, 1890s.n.1890-01-01-
James P. Kernochan, as executor, etc., and others against the New York Elevated Railroad Company and the Manhattan Railway Company, (action no. 2)brief for defendants on appeal from order refusing them leave to serve supplemental answerC.G. Burgoyne's Printing Business1890-01-01
-
S. Charles Welsh, as surviving executor of and trustee under the last will and testament of George W. Welsh, deceased, plaintiff and respondent, against the New York Elevated Railroad Company and the Manhattan Railway Company, defendants and appellantsrespondent's points on motion for reargumentEvening Post Job Printing House1890-01-01
-
James P. Kernochan, individually and as executor of and trustee under the last will and testament of Joseph Kernochan, deceased, William S. Kernochan, Eliza P. Garr, J. Frederic Kernochan, Henry P. Kernochan, Abba E. Kernochan, Louisa M. Kernochan, as administratrix of the goods, chattels and credits of John A. Kernochan, deceased, and Margaret Montgomery, plaintiffs, against the New York Elevated Railroad Company and Manhattan Railway Company, defendantsrespondents' brief on the appeal from the orderEvening Post Job Printing Office1890-01-01
-
Eliza W. White, plaintiff, respondent, against the New York Elevated Railroad Company and the Manhattan Railway Company, defendants, appellantsbrief for appellantsLivingston Middleditch & Co.1890-01-01
-
In the Court of Appeals, Sophie E. Minton, plaintiff, respondent, against the New York Elevated Railroad Company and the Manhattan Railway Company, defendants, appellantsbrief for appellantsLivingston Middleditch & Co.1890-01-01
-
James P. Kernochan, individually and as executor and trustee and others, plaintiffs and respondents, against the New York Elevated Railroad Company and the Manhattan Railway Company, defendants and appellantscase on appealOberly & Newell, Printers1890-01-01
-
In the Court of Appeals, Edward Roberts plaintiff and respondent, against the New York Elevated Railroad Company and the Manhattan Railway Company defendants and appellantspoints for respondentC.G. Burgoyne's Printing Business1890-01-01
-
Howard Conkling, plaintiff-respondent, against the New York Elevated Railroad Company and the Manhattan Railway Company, defendants-appellants[s.n.]1890-01-01
-
In the Court of Appeals, Second Division, James P. Kernochan, et al., respondents, against the New York Elevated Railroad Company, et al., appellants, no. 464Livingston Middleditch & Co.1890-01-01
-
Edith K. Roosevelt and Emily T. Carow, plaintiffs, respondents, against the New York Elevated Railroad Company and the Manhattan Railway Company, defendants, appellants, December term 1889brief for appellantsC.G. Burgoyne's, Printing Business1890-01-01
-
Rules and regulations for the government of the operating officers and employés of the Manhattan Railway Coto take effect January 1, 1890s.n.1890-01-01
-
James P. Kernochan, individually and as executor of and trustee under the last will and testament of Joseph Kernochan, deceased and others, plaintiffs and respondents against the New York Elevated Railroad Company and the Manhattan Railway Company, defendants and appellantsbrief for respondents on appeal from judgmentEvening Post Job Printing Office1890-01-01
-
Anna Maria Doyle against the Manhattan Railway Company, et alplaintiff's brief on the reargumentEvening Post Job Printing Office1890-01-01
-
In Court of Appeals, James H. McGean, as executor of Delia Powers, deceased plaintiff and respondent, against the Manhattan Railway Company, defendant and appellantbrief in behalf of Byam K. Stevens and others : who have obtained judgment against the defendant in similar actions being part of a brief prepared in the case of Seaman et al., against the Metropolitan Elevated Ry. Co., and the Manhattan Ry. Co[s.n.]1890-01-01
-
Byam K. Stevens, plaintiff and respondent, against the New York Elevated Railroad Company and the Manhattan Railway Company, defendants and appellantsbrief for respondentEvening Post Job Printing Office1890-01-01
-
James P. Kernochan, individually and as executor and trustee and others, plaintiffs, respondents, against the New York Elevated Railroad Company and the Manhattan Railway Company, defendants, appellants, General term, December, 1889supplemental brief for defendantsC.G. Burgoyne's Printing Business1890-01-01
-
David Sears, et al., respondents, against the Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company and the Manhattan Railway Company, appellantsappellants' pointsLivingston Middleditch & Co., Printers1891-01-01
-
In the Court of Appeals, state of New York, Anna Maria Doyle, plaintiff and respondent, against the Manhattan Railway Company and the Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company, defendants and appellantscase on appealOberly & Newell, Printers1891-01-01
-
In the Court of AppealsDavid Sears, Henry F. Sears, and Emily F. Sears, plaintiffs, respondents, against the Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company and the Manhattan Railway Company, defendants, appellants : brief for appellantsLivingston Middleditch & Co.1891-01-01
-
In the Court of Appeals, David Sears, Henry F. Sears and Emily E. Sears, plaintiffs and respondents, against the Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company and the Manhattan Railway Company, defendants and appellantsbrief for respondentsEvening Post Job Printing House1891-01-01
-
In the Court of Appeals, State of New York, James P. Kernochan, individually and as executor of and trustee under the last will and testament of Joseph Kernochan, deceased and others, plaintiffs and respondents, against the New York Elevated Railroad Company, and the Manhattan Railway Company, defendants and appellantscase on appeal, action no. 2.Oberly & Newell, Stationers and Printers1891-01-01
-
Rutherford Stuyvesant, plaintiff, vs. the New York Elevated Railroad Company and the Manhattan Railway Company, defendantsbrief for defendants[s.n.]1893-01-01
-
In the Court of Appeals, State of New YorkAugust Klipstein, plaintiff and respondent, against the New York Elevated Railroad Company and the Manhattan Railway Company, defendants and appellants : case on appealDouglas Taylor & Co., Law Printers1894-01-01
-
In the Court of Appeals of the state of New York, Ruth R. Hutton, plaintiff-appellant, against the Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company and the Manhattan Railway Company, defendants-respondentscase on appealAppeal Printing Co.1900-01-01