Estimating tree biomass, carbon, and nitrogen in two vegetation control treatments in an 11-year-old Douglas-fir plantation on a highly productive site
Our rough guess is there are 7,250 words in this book.
At a pace averaging 250 words per minute, this book will take 0 hours and 29 minutes to read. With a half hour per day, this will take 1 days to read.
How long will it take you?
This book will take an estimated to read at a reading speed averaging words per minute. With 30 minutes per day, this will take to read.
Enter your reading speedYou can take one of our WPM reading speed tests to find your reading speed.
Create a free account to track your reading progress, build your reading list, and set reading goals.
Author
Contributions
- Forest Products Laboratory (U.S.) - Contributor
Publication
2013 - United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR, Wisconsin
Language
English
Word Count
7,250 words, Guess
Page Count
29 pages
Identifiers
- Open LibraryOL30996122M
- OCLC Control Number855540818
- OCLC Control Number855538983
- Library of Congress Control Number2013487621
Classifications
- DDC634.9/509797
- LCCSD397.D7 D48 2013
Description
We sampled trees grown with and without competing vegetation control in an 11-year-old Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) plantation on a highly productive site in southwestern Washington to create diameter- based allometric equations for estimating individual-tree bole, branch, foliar, and total aboveground biomass. We used these equations to estimate per-hectare aboveground biomass, nitrogen (N), and carbon (C) content, and compared these results to (1) estimates based on biomass equations published in other studies, and (2) estimates made using the mean-tree method rather than allometric equations. Component and total-tree biomass equations were not influenced by the presence of vegetation control, although per-hectare biomass, C, and N estimates were greater where vegetation control was applied. Our biomass estimates differed from estimates using previously published biomass equations by as much as 23 percent. When using the mean-tree biomass estimation approach, we found that incorporating a previously published biomass equation improved accuracy of the mean-tree diameter calculation.
Subjects
Series Statement
- Research paper -- PNW-RP-591
Links
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!