A matter of interpretation
federal courts and the law : an essay
Our rough guess is there are 39,750 words in this book.
At a pace averaging 250 words per minute, this book will take 2 hours and 39 minutes to read. With a half hour per day, this will take 5 days to read.
How long will it take you?
This book will take an estimated to read at a reading speed averaging words per minute. With 30 minutes per day, this will take to read.
Enter your reading speedYou can take one of our WPM reading speed tests to find your reading speed.
Create a free account to track your reading progress, build your reading list, and set reading goals.
We earn a commission on purchases
Author
Contributions
- Gutmann, Amy. - Contributor
Publication
1997 - Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J, New Jersey
Language
English
Word Count
39,750 words, Guess
Page Count
159 pages
Identifiers
- Open LibraryOL1001700M
- ISBN-100691026300
- OCLC Control Number35280772
- OCLC Control Numbermatterofinterpre00scal
- Library of Congress Control Number96040969
and 2 more
- LibraryThing90949
- Goodreads1769628
Classifications
- DDC347.73/2634
- LCCKF4552 .S28 1997
Description
In exploring the neglected art of statutory interpretation, Antonin Scalia urges that judges resist the temptation to use legislative intention and legislative history. In his view, it is incompatible with democratic government to allow the meaning of a statute to be determined by what the judges think the lawgivers meant rather than by what the legislature actually promulgated. Eschewing the judicial law-making that is the essence of common law, judges should interpret statutes and regulations by focusing on the text itself. Scalia then extends this principle to constitutional law. He proposes that we abandon the notion of an ever changing Constitution and pay attention to the Constitution's original meaning. Although not subscribing to the "strict constructionism" that would prevent applying the Constitution to modern circumstances, Scalia emphatically rejects the idea that judges can properly "smuggle" in new rights or deny old rights by using the Due Process Clause, for instance. In fact, such judicial discretion might lead to the destruction of the Bill of Rights if a majority of the judges ever wished to reach that most undesirable of goals. This essay is followed by four commentaries by Gordon Wood, Laurence Tribe, Mary Ann Glendon, and Ronald Dworkin, who engage Justice Scalia's ideas about judicial interpretation, and the volume concludes with a response by Scalia. Dealing with one of the most fundamental issues in American law, A Matter of Interpretation reveals what is at the heart of this important debate.
First Sentence
THE FOLLOWING easy attempts to explain the current neglected state of the science of construing legal texts, and offers a few suggestions for improvement.
Excerpt
THE FOLLOWING easy attempts to explain the current neglected state of the science of construing legal texts, and offers a few suggestions for improvement.
Subjects
Topics
Places
Series Statement
- The University Center for Human Values series
Other Editions
- A matter of interpretation: federal courts and the law : an essay
Similar Books
Casenote Legal Briefs: Environmental Law - Keyed to Plater, Abrams, Goldfarb, Graham, Heinzerling & Wirth
Casenotes
Processes of Constitutional Decisionmaking: Cases and Materials
Sanford Levinson, Paul Brest
A matter of interpretation: federal courts and the law : an essay
by Antonin Scalia ; with commentary by Amy Gutmann, editor, Gordon S. Wood, Laurence H. Tribe, Mary Ann Glendon, Ronald Dworkin ; with a new introduction by Akhil Reed Amar ; and a new afterword by Steven G. Calabresi
Edward S. Corwin's The Constitution and what it means today.
Rev. by Harold W. Chase and Craig R. Ducat.
View of the Constitution of the United States: with selected writings
St. George Tucker ; foreword by Clyde N. Wilson.
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!