Costs and service levels of water and sanitation
a study of peri-urban locations in Andhra Pradesh
Our rough guess is there are 10,500 words in this book.
At a pace averaging 250 words per minute, this book will take 0 hours and 42 minutes to read. With a half hour per day, this will take 2 days to read.
How long will it take you?
This book will take an estimated to read at a reading speed averaging words per minute. With 30 minutes per day, this will take to read.
Enter your reading speedYou can take one of our WPM reading speed tests to find your reading speed.
Create a free account to track your reading progress, build your reading list, and set reading goals.
Author
Contributions
- WASHCost (India) Project - Contributor
- Centre for Economic and Social Studies, Hyderabad - Contributor
Publication
2012 - WashCost (India) Project, Centre for Economic and Social Studies, Hyderabad, India
Language
English
Word Count
10,500 words, Guess
Page Count
42 pages
Identifiers
- Library of Congress Control Number2014356603
- Open LibraryOL31121462M
Description
The present study's main objectives are to estimate the cost of service provision across peri-urban locations for drinking water and sanitation and the relative expenditure on different cost components in reality against the eisting norms. Life Cycle Cost Approach (LCCA) is adopted to estimate the actual cost components of service provision. The study is based on the analysis carried out using data collected from 18 peri-urban locations spread over nine agro-climatic zones of AP. The data is collected at two levels. At level one cost data were obtained from 18 muncipalities - 2 from each zone. This data is generated from the official records of Public Health and Engineering Department (PHED) at the municipality level. At level two, detailed household level data on socio-economic aspects along with the information pertaining to drinking water and sanitation are gathered from a selected ward from each of the 11 municipalities. Most of the investments are on capital expenditure on hardware i.e on creation of water and sanitation infrastructure assets. Investment on capital expenditure on software is either absent of negligible. Allocations towards water planning and designing are negligible. At the state level, for water, only 30 percent of the households own tap. During summer, households scored above basic services in terms of quality and reliability while 16 percent of the households scored above basic services in terms of accessibility. In case of quantity, we do not find any households which scored above basic service levels.
Subjects
Series Statement
- Working paper -- no. 119
- WASHCost - CESS working paper -- no. 20
Links
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!