Market distortions when agents are better informed

Description

"Agents are often better informed than the clients who hire them and may exploit this informational advantage. Real-estate agents, who know much more about the housing market than the typical homeowner, are one example. Because real estate agents receive only a small share of the incremental profit when a house sells for a higher value, there is an incentive for them to convince their clients to sell their houses too cheaply and too quickly. We test these predictions by comparing home sales in which real estate agents are hired by others to sell a home to instances in which a real estate agent sells his or her own home. In the former case, the agent has distorted incentives; in the latter case, the agent wants to pursue the first-best. Consistent with the theory, we find homes owned by real estate agents sell for about 3.7 percent more than other houses and stay on the market about 9.5 days longer, even after controlling for a wide range of housing characteristics. Situations in which the agent's informational advantage is larger lead to even greater distortions"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site.

Subjects

Series Statement

• ABF working paper -- #2111.

Other Editions

• Market distortions when agents are better informed: a theoretical and empirical exploration of the value of information in real estate transactionsAmerican Bar Foundation2002-01-01
• Market distortions when agents are better informedNational Bureau of Economic Research2005-01-01
• Market distortions when agents are better informedElectronic resourceNational Bureau of Economic Research2005-01-01