Assumption-based planning for Army 21
Our rough guess is there are 17,500 words in this book.
At a pace averaging 250 words per minute, this book will take 1 hours and 10 minutes to read. With a half hour per day, this will take 3 days to read.
How long will it take you?
This book will take an estimated to read at a reading speed averaging words per minute. With 30 minutes per day, this will take to read.
Enter your reading speedYou can take one of our WPM reading speed tests to find your reading speed.
Create a free account to track your reading progress, build your reading list, and set reading goals.
We earn a commission on purchases
Author
Contributions
- Levin, Morlie H. - Contributor
- United States. Army. - Contributor
- Rand Corporation. - Contributor
- Arroyo Center. - Contributor
Publication
1992 - Rand, Santa Monica, CA, California
Language
English
Word Count
17,500 words, Guess
Page Count
70 pages
Identifiers
- Open LibraryOL1472645M
- ISBN-100833012681
- OCLC Control Number26819866
- Library of Congress Control Number93135858
- Goodreads4350033
Classifications
- DDC355/.00973
- LCCUA24 .A7 1994
Description
This report describes a long-range planning methodology developed for Army 21 - an Army planning exercise designed to envision how the Army will fight between 15 and 30 years in the future - and demonstrates a partial implementation of the methodology by generating a set of alternative futures. In applying the methodology to the AirLand Battle-Future (ALB-F) concept, the authors found that the scenarios generated can be properly used to do two things: think about actions that should be taken in current planning to begin preparing for the eventuation of any of the scenarios, and identify "signposts"--Events or trends that would suggest the world had taken an important turn toward one of the challenges to the ALB-F concept. The authors also found the methodology could be improved by developing a rudimentary theory of assumptions to guide their discovery and formulation. Finally, the authors found the ALB-F concept to be robust because it was difficult to come up with assumptions underlying it that might be violated; such a finding implies that doctrine writers will be challenged to develop the concept into a compelling guide to force structure development, training, etc.
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!