Models for anchoring and acquiescence bias in consumption data
Our rough guess is there are 9,750 words in this book.
At a pace averaging 250 words per minute, this book will take 0 hours and 39 minutes to read. With a half hour per day, this will take 2 days to read.
How long will it take you?
This book will take an estimated to read at a reading speed averaging words per minute. With 30 minutes per day, this will take to read.
Enter your reading speedYou can take one of our WPM reading speed tests to find your reading speed.
Create a free account to track your reading progress, build your reading list, and set reading goals.
Author
Contributions
- Hurd, Michael D. - Contributor
- National Bureau of Economic Research. - Contributor
Publication
2004 - National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass, Massachusetts
Language
English
Word Count
9,750 words, Guess
Page Count
39 pages
Identifiers
- OCLC Control Number55138180
- Open LibraryOL17621511M
Description
"Item non-response in household survey data on economic variables such as income, assets or consumption is a well-known problem. Follow-up unfolding bracket questions have been used as a tool to collect partial information on respondents that do not answer an open-ended question. It is also known, however, that mistakes are made in answering such unfolding bracket questions. In this paper, we develop several limited dependent variable models to analyze two sources of mistakes, anchoring and acquiescence (or yeasaying), focusing on the first bracket question. We use the experimental module of the AHEAD 1995 data, where the sample is randomly split into respondents who get an open-ended question on the amount of total family consumption - with follow-up unfolding brackets (of the form: is consumption $X or more?) for those who answer immediately directed to unfolding brackets. In both cases, the entry point of the unfolding bracket sequence is randomized. We compare models in which the probability of a mistake depends on the deviation between the true consumption amount and the entry point amount $X and models in which it does not. We find that allowing for acquiescence bias substantially changes the conclusions on the selective nature of non-response to the open-ended question and on the distribution of consumption expenditures in the population. Once acquiescence bias is taken into account, anchoring in the first bracket question plays only a minor role"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site.
Subjects
Series Statement
- NBER working paper series -- no. 10461.
- Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research) -- working paper no. 10461.
Links
Other Editions
- Models for anchoring and acquiescence bias in consumption data
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!