Legislating statutory interpretation
perspectives from the common law world
Our rough guess is there are 108,750 words in this book.
At a pace averaging 250 words per minute, this book will take 7 hours and 15 minutes to read. With a half hour per day, this will take 15 days to read.
How long will it take you?
This book will take an estimated to read at a reading speed averaging words per minute. With 30 minutes per day, this will take to read.
Enter your reading speedYou can take one of our WPM reading speed tests to find your reading speed.
Create a free account to track your reading progress, build your reading list, and set reading goals.
Author
Publication
2018 - Thomson Reuters Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Ontario
Language
English
Word Count
108,750 words, Guess
Page Count
435 pages
Identifiers
- Open LibraryOL59003302M
- ISBN-139780779886777
- ISBN-100779886771
- OCLC Control Number1055681264
Classifications
- DDC340/.1
- LCCK290 .L44 2018
Description
"Legislating Statutory Interpretation: Perspectives from the Common Law World is a collection of essays focusing on the relationship between interpretation acts and statutory interpretation. The activity of interpreting statutes is often thought to be quintessentially judicial and is largely governed by common law rules and principles of statutory interpretation. Interestingly, however, in every province in Canada (and in many other jurisdictions), parliaments and legislatures have enacted statutes that purport to dictate to courts how they should interpret legislation. For instance, section 8 of the British Columbia Interpretation Act states that 'Every enactment must be construed as being remedial, and must be given such fair, large and liberal construction and interpretation as best ensures the attainment of its objects.' What is the significance of these attempts by legislatures to direct courts to adopt a particular interpretive method, and one that is, moreover, essentially teleological in its orientation? From the standpoint of legal and constitutional theory, this incursion by parliament into this sacrosanct realm of the judiciary seems deeply problematic. Yet the truth of the matter is that courts have largely ignored these interpretation acts and applied a common-law interpretive methodology. With the help of leading legal scholars drawn from all over the Commonwealth, this text explores the relationship between courts and legislatures in establishing methodologies for statutory interpretation. Is this relationship constitutionally permissible? And if so, is it desirable? This collection of essays will explore these questions."
Subjects
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!