Anti-Gide
neboli, optimismus bez pověr a ilusí
[Vyd. 1.]
Our rough guess is there are 34,000 words in this book.
At a pace averaging 250 words per minute, this book will take 2 hours and 16 minutes to read. With a half hour per day, this will take 5 days to read.
How long will it take you?
This book will take an estimated to read at a reading speed averaging words per minute. With 30 minutes per day, this will take to read.
Enter your reading speedYou can take one of our WPM reading speed tests to find your reading speed.
Create a free account to track your reading progress, build your reading list, and set reading goals.
Author
Publication
1950 - Vydavatelstvo Druzstevní práce, Praha, Czech Republic
Language
Czech
Alternate Titles
- Optimismus bez pověr a ilusí.
Description
By its book "the antione or Optimism without superstitions and illusions" Stanislav Kostka Neumann is addressed to the young people especially. "It is with you, young friend, that I propose this result of a life rather long but not extraordinary", says it in the foreword. It subjects the text of Andre Gide to a detailed criticism and systematically dissects it in seven chapters devoted inter alia to the religion, intellectualism, freedom, the democracy, the revolt of the intellectuals and artistic creation. It does not claim to be without party taken: "The class struggle must be led to end and to finish by a total defeat of the exploiteurs," says it categorically. While attacking Gide, it attacks not only with all the adversaries of the Soviet mode, but also all those which doubt. It fustigates the individualism of Gide which, in his opinion, makes null and void the Gidian design of happiness. It is also caught some so that it calls the play of Gide with the religion and it concludes: "The liberal individualism which is the base even of each intellectual, who it is a fanatic or a hedonist like Gide, does not feel a collective responsibility. Friend, am never his example!" In the chapter devoted to the democracy, it asks: "Dictatorship of the proletariat? But it is always of the democracy, only it is a democracy for the majority, not a democracy for the minority, the exploiteurs." It is logical that such a reasoning carries out it to justify the lawsuits against the inconvenient people with the mode of Moscow. "There were many people who had various doubts on the lawsuits of Moscow, it notices. The most widespread and supported idea, of course, by the middle-class press and trockist was that which Stalin got rid of his "adversaries". Not, the proletariat gets rid of the saboteurs." And Neumann to criticize, inter alia, Zavis Kalandra, communist journalist, who dared to blame the Stalinist lawsuits. This moment, Neumann does not know and cannot know that Zavis Kalandra will be condemned to die in the political lawsuits of the Fifties.
Subjects
Topics
Places
Series Statement
- Svét -- 57.
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!