The Arc of Due Process in American Constitutional Law
Our rough guess is there are 68,000 words in this book.
At a pace averaging 250 words per minute, this book will take 4 hours and 32 minutes to read. With a half hour per day, this will take 9 days to read.
How long will it take you?
This book will take an estimated to read at a reading speed averaging words per minute. With 30 minutes per day, this will take to read.
Enter your reading speedYou can take one of our WPM reading speed tests to find your reading speed.
Create a free account to track your reading progress, build your reading list, and set reading goals.
Publication
2013-04-24 - Oxford University Press
Language
English
Word Count
68,000 words, Guess
Page Count
272 pages
Physical Format
Hardcover
Identifiers
- Open LibraryOL27589301M
- ISBN-139780199990801
- ISBN-100199990808
- OCLC Control Number813415931
- Library of Congress Control Number2012042268
and 1 more
- Amazon0199990808
Classifications
- LCCKF4765.S85 2013
Description
"Controversies over military tribunals, parental rights, same-sex marriage, information privacy, procedural rights of juveniles and prisoners, physician-assisted suicide, and reproductive rights fill the landscape of contemporary legal debate and media discussion. All fall under the umbrella of the Due Process Clauses of the United States Constitution and its protection against arbitrary government action. In The Arc of Due Process in American Constitutional Law, Sullivan and Massaro describe the intricate history of modern due process rights, beginning with its 'rule of law' roots. They maintain that constitutional theory and practice must take this long history, and especially its inherent dynamism, into account. The authors then describe the doctrinal elaboration of due process principles in American constitutional law and identify the fundamental norms that bind this broad swath of constitutional law together. They focus on the primary strands of due process - procedural and substantive - and explore the hybrid zone between them, as well as their interdependence. Finally, they defend the judicial practice of redefining due process over time to accommodate the forces of change. Judges must work within the historical, doctrinal, and normative framework of their predecessors, but likewise must respect these legal traditions without tethering modern courts to exclusive or unthinking reliance on past practices. Judicial humility and wisdom thus require considerable restraint, but also acceptance of responsibility for effecting positive evolution of law. This is the inescapable paradox of judicial power to interpret the Constitution, and is most powerfully evident when judges define deprivations of 'life, liberty, or property, without due process of law'"--Unedited summary from book jacket.
Subjects
Topics
Other Editions
- The Arc of Due Process in American Constitutional Law
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!