A requirements analysis of the 2008 MILSATCOM architecture
Our rough guess is there are 30,750 words in this book.
At a pace averaging 250 words per minute, this book will take 2 hours and 3 minutes to read. With a half hour per day, this will take 4 days to read.
How long will it take you?
This book will take an estimated to read at a reading speed averaging words per minute. With 30 minutes per day, this will take to read.
Enter your reading speedYou can take one of our WPM reading speed tests to find your reading speed.
Create a free account to track your reading progress, build your reading list, and set reading goals.
Author
Publication
1997 - Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, Calif, California
Language
English
Word Count
30,750 words, Guess
Page Count
123 pages
Identifiers
- Internet Archiverequirementsanal00brad
- OCLC Control Number640501069
- Open LibraryOL25295263M
Description
The U.S. Navy is different from the other armed forces in its communications requirements. Due to the lack of terrestrial connectivity possessed by other services, the Navy has become highly reliant on SATCOM for all forms of communication. This thesis presents a requirements analysis of a proposed MILSATCOM architecture. The architecture, when fielded, will form the backbone for all U.S. military satellite communications. It is expected to be operational in the year 2008. The purpose of the study is to determine if the proposed architecture meets Naval communications requirements as defined in the Emerging Requirements Data Base (ERDB). In keeping with the stated purpose, only Naval requirements were loaded for the analysis. Requirements from other services and government agencies were not considered for this study. As we enter the Information Age, communications connectivity and capacity will equate to operational effectiveness for Naval forces. This thesis identifies requirements shortfalls in the proposed architecture. It specifies the frequency bands where deficiencies are evident. It also proposes alternatives to fulfill or augment noted requirements shortfalls.
Subjects
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!