Risk and global economic architecture
why full financial integration may be undesirable
We couldn't estimate the reading time for this book.
Author
Contributions
- National Bureau of Economic Research. - Contributor
Publication
2010 - National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, Massachusetts
Language
English
Word Count
0 words, Guess
Page Count
0 pages
Physical Format
Electronic resource
Identifiers
- Library of Congress Control Number2010655734
- Open LibraryOL24101584M
Classifications
- LCCHB1
Description
"This paper provides a general framework for analyzing the optimal degree and form of financial integration. Full integration is not in general optimal: faced with a choice between two polar regimes, full integration or autarky, autarky may be superior. The intuition is simple: if underlying technologies are not convex, then risk-sharing can lower expected utility. The simplistic models arguing for financial integration typically employed in economics assume convexity; but the world is rife with non-convexities, e.g. associated with bankruptcy. The architecture of the credit market can, for instance, affect the likelihood of a bankruptcy cascade, "contagion," and systemic risk"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site.
Subjects
Series Statement
- NBER working paper series -- working paper 15718
- Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research : Online) -- working paper no. 15718.
Links
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!