Reforming pensions
principles, analytical errors, and policy directions
Our rough guess is there are 5,750 words in this book.
At a pace averaging 250 words per minute, this book will take 0 hours and 23 minutes to read. With a half hour per day, this will take 1 days to read.
How long will it take you?
This book will take an estimated to read at a reading speed averaging words per minute. With 30 minutes per day, this will take to read.
Enter your reading speedYou can take one of our WPM reading speed tests to find your reading speed.
Create a free account to track your reading progress, build your reading list, and set reading goals.
Author
Contributions
- Diamond, Peter A. - Contributor
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Economics - Contributor
Publication
2008 - Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Economics, Cambridge, MA, Massachusetts
Language
English
Word Count
5,750 words, Guess
Page Count
23 pages
Identifiers
- Internet Archivereformingpension00barr
- OCLC Control Number671498632
- Open LibraryOL24647173M
Description
This article, based on two books (Barr and Diamond 2008, forthcoming), sets out a series of principles for pension design rooted in economic theory: pension systems have multiple objectives, analysis should consider the pension system as a whole, analysis should be framed in a second-best context, different systems share risks differently, and systems have different effects by generation and by gender. That discussion is reinforced by identification of a series of widespread analytical errors: tunnel vision, improper use of first-best analysis, improper use of steady-state analysis, incomplete analysis of implicit pension debt, incomplete analysis of the impact of funding (including excessive focus on financial flows, failure to consider how funding is generated, and improper focus on the type of asset in trust funds), and ignoring distributional effects. The second part of the article considers implications for policy: there is no single best pension design; earlier retirement does little or nothing to reduce unemployment; unsustainable pension promises need to be addressed directly; a move from PAYG towards funding in a mandatory system may or may not be welfare improving; and implementation matters - policy design that exceeds a country's capacity to implement it is bad policy design. We illustrate the ranges of designs of pension systems that fit the fiscal and institutional capacity constraints typical at different levels of economic development. The potential gains from simplicity imply that a country capable of implementing an administratively demanding plan does not necessarily gain from doing so. New Zealand has a simple pension system through choice, not constraint. Keywords: Pension, social security JEL Classifications: H55.
Subjects
Topics
Series Statement
- Working paper series / Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Economics -- working paper 08-22
- Working paper (Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Economics) -- no. 08-22.
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!