Inhibition of return with multiple shifts of attention.
Our rough guess is there are 29,250 words in this book.
At a pace averaging 250 words per minute, this book will take 1 hours and 57 minutes to read. With a half hour per day, this will take 4 days to read.
How long will it take you?
This book will take an estimated to read at a reading speed averaging words per minute. With 30 minutes per day, this will take to read.
Enter your reading speedYou can take one of our WPM reading speed tests to find your reading speed.
Create a free account to track your reading progress, build your reading list, and set reading goals.
Word Count
29,250 words, Guess
Page Count
117 pages
Identifiers
- ISBN-100494078340
- ISBN-139780494078341
- Open LibraryOL21303049M
Description
Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to the finding that targets at cued locations are responded to more slowly than targets at uncued locations when a relatively long interval occurs between the two events. An early and still dominant explanation is that IOR is a mechanism that biases us toward novelty to increase the efficiency of search. This idea has rarely been explicitly tested, however, given a lack of agreement regarding how to measure IOR in search tasks. The present thesis uses variations of the multiple cuing paradigm to address two noticeable gaps in the IOR literature relating to visual search.These results fit with both attentional and oculomotor accounts of IOR, and suggest a strong role for IOR in visual search, with its influence increasing as the number of shifts of attention increases. Collectively, these findings shed considerable light on IOR: It appears to be faster acting, longer lasting, and more pervasive than originally thought.Second, the magnitude of IOR is greater at more recently cued locations. Experiments 4-7 attempted to discriminate two explanations for this pattern: decay as a function of time vs. interference from intervening cues. Across experiments, time was held constant and the number of cues preceding target onset was manipulated. Counter-intuitively, the results demonstrated that IOR increased as the number of cues on a trial increased, suggesting that IOR might actually increase as attention continually shifts during visual search. Accordingly, IOR is observed outside of the normal temporal parameters with continual shifts of attention in Experiment 8.First, although there is some evidence consistent with IOR influencing visual search, there is no explicit evidence that IOR can accrue to a recently attended location if attention is rapidly shifted to new locations every 50 ms---the speed at which attention is thought to shift in normal visual search. In Experiments 1-3, participants observed cues that were of either a short (50 ms) or long (500 ms) duration prior to a detection target. The results showed that IOR can accrue at up to four locations with multiple rapid shifts of attention, quickly enough to facilitate visual search.
Subjects
Links
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!