Atrocity, Punishment, and International Law
Our rough guess is there are 79,000 words in this book.
At a pace averaging 250 words per minute, this book will take 5 hours and 16 minutes to read. With a half hour per day, this will take 11 days to read.
How long will it take you?
This book will take an estimated to read at a reading speed averaging words per minute. With 30 minutes per day, this will take to read.
Enter your reading speedYou can take one of our WPM reading speed tests to find your reading speed.
Create a free account to track your reading progress, build your reading list, and set reading goals.
Word Count
79,000 words, Guess
Page Count
316 pages
Physical Format
Paperback
Identifiers
- Open LibraryOL7752186M
- ISBN-139780521691383
- ISBN-100521691389
- OCLC Control Number74492210
- Library of Congress Control Number2006035762
and 2 more
- LibraryThing5416714
- Goodreads945780
Classifications
- LCCK5301 .D78
Description
This book argues that accountability for extraordinary atrocity crimes should not uncritically adopt the methods and assumptions of ordinary liberal criminal law. Criminal punishment designed for common criminals is a response to mass atrocity and a device to promote justice in its aftermath. This book comes to this conclusion after reviewing the sentencing practices of international, national, and local courts and tribunals that punish atrocity perpetrators. Sentencing practices of these institutions fail to attain the goals that international criminal law ascribes to punishment, in particular retribution and deterrence. Fresh thinking is necessary to confront the collective nature of mass atrocity and the disturbing reality that individual membership in group-based killings is often not maladaptive or deviant behavior but, rather, adaptive or conformist behavior. This book turns to a modern, and adventurously pluralist, application of classical notions of cosmopolitanism to a...
Description
"In Atrocity, Punishment, and International Law, Mark Drumbl rethinks how perpetrators of atrocity crimes should be punished. After first reviewing the sentencing practices of courts and tribunals that censure genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes, he concludes that these practices fall short of the goals that international criminal law ascribes to punishment, in particular retribution and deterrence. This raises the question whether international prosecutorial and correctional preferences are as effective as we hope. Drumbl argues that the pursuit of accountability for extraordinary atrocity crimes should not uncritically adopt the methods and assumptions of ordinary liberal criminal law."--Jacket.
Subjects
Topics
Other Editions
- Atrocity, Punishment, and International Law
Reader Reviews
No reviews yet for this book.
Be the first to share your thoughts!